What is the total amount if both the subsequent injury and previous injury are considered to determine the fund?

What is the total amount if both the subsequent injury and previous injury are considered to determine the fund?

• A. 60%
• B. 70%
• C. 80%
• D. 90%

Answer: (B)

To understand why the total amount is 70% when both the subsequent injury and previous injury are taken into account, consider the concept of combining multiple injuries in a self-insured context. When assessing benefits or compensations from insurance funds, typically, the percentage figures represent the extent of disability or impairment recognized due to injuries. The percentage often combines the degree of disability caused by both injuries—first calculating the disability percentage for the prior injury and then adding the subsequent injury percentage while factoring in any overlaps or intensifications of disability caused by the combination of the two. If the previous injury is assessed at a certain percentage and the subsequent injury adds a specific percentage, the total is a result of this cumulative assessment. In this context, the calculation leading to 70% suggests a scenario where the combination of the disabilities does not exceed a certain limit due to regulatory or policy guidelines on how multiple injuries are assessed together. This approach ensures that individuals receive fair compensation reflecting the total impact of both injuries rather than simply summing their respective disability percentages, which could lead to disproportionately high compensation.

To understand why the total amount is 70% when both the subsequent injury and previous injury are taken into account, consider the concept of combining multiple injuries in a self-insured context. When assessing benefits or compensations from insurance funds, typically, the percentage figures represent the extent of disability or impairment recognized due to injuries.

The percentage often combines the degree of disability caused by both injuries—first calculating the disability percentage for the prior injury and then adding the subsequent injury percentage while factoring in any overlaps or intensifications of disability caused by the combination of the two. If the previous injury is assessed at a certain percentage and the subsequent injury adds a specific percentage, the total is a result of this cumulative assessment.

In this context, the calculation leading to 70% suggests a scenario where the combination of the disabilities does not exceed a certain limit due to regulatory or policy guidelines on how multiple injuries are assessed together. This approach ensures that individuals receive fair compensation reflecting the total impact of both injuries rather than simply summing their respective disability percentages, which could lead to disproportionately high compensation.